Referenser
Allen, G. E., Common, E. A., Germer, K. A., Lane, K. L., Buckman, M. M., Oakes, W. P., & Menzies, H. M. (2019). A Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Active Supervision in Pre-K–12 Settings. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), s. 167–182.
Alter, P., & Haydon, T. (2017). Characteristics of Effective Classroom Rules: A Review of the Literature. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(2), s. 114–127.
American Institutes for Research, Tillgänglig: https://goodbehaviorgame.air.org/ [Hämtad 2021-08-26]
Biesta, G. (2007). Why ”What Works” Won’t Work: Evidence-Based Practice And The Democratic Deficit In Educational Research. Educational Theory, 57(1), s. 1–22.
Boberg, K., & Sterlinger Ahlring, A. (2020). Att äga klassrummet : 10 perspektiv på ledarskap för lärare. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
Bowman-Perrott, L., Burke, M. D., Zaini, S., Zhang, N., & Vannest, K. (2016). Promoting Positive Behavior Using the Good Behavior Game: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(3), s. 180–190.
Brophy, J. (2006). History of Research on Classroom Management. I Weinstein, C. E. C. (red.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (s. 17–43). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Browne, K. (2013). Challenging Behaviour in Secondary School Students: Classroom Strategies for Increasing Positive Behaviour. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 10(1), s. 125–146.
Chaffee, R., Johnson, A., & Volpe, R. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Class-Wide Interventions for Supporting Student Behavior. School Psychology Review, 46(2), s. 149–164.
Common, E. A., Bross, L. A., Oakes, W. P., Cantwell, E. D., Lane, K. L., & Germer, K. A. (2019). Systematic Review of High Probability Requests in K–12 Settings: Examining the Evidence Base. Behavioral Disorders, 45(1), s. 3–21.
Common, E. A., Lane, K. L., Cantwell, E. D., Brunsting, N. C., Oakes, W. P., Germer, K. A., & Bross, L. A. (2020). Teacher-Delivered Strategies to Increase Students’ Opportunities to Respond: A Systematic Methodological Review. Behavioral Disorders, 45(2), s. 67–84.
Cook, B. G., Buysse, V., Klingner, J., Landrum, T. J., McWilliam, R. A., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. W. (2015). CEC’s Standards for Classifying the Evidence Base of Practices in Special Education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), s. 220–234.
Cooper, P. (2011). Teacher strategies for effective intervention with students presenting social, emotional and behavioural difficulties: an international review. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26(1), s. 71–86.
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-Centered Teacher-Student Relationships Are Effective: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), s. 113–143.
Dyssegaard, C. B., Egelund, N., & Sommersel, H. B. (2017). A systematic review of what enables or hinders the use of research-based knowledge in primary and lower secondary school. Köpenhamn: Danish Clearinghouse for Educational Research, Department of Education, Aarhus University.
Emmer, E., Emmer, E. T., & Sabornie, E. J. (2015). Handbook of classroom management. New York Routledge.
Ennis, R., Royer, D., Lane, K., & Griffith, C. (2017). A Systematic Review of Precorrection in PK–12 Settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 40(4), s. 465–495.
Ennis, R. P., Royer, D. J., Lane, K. L., & Dunlap, K. D. (2020a). Behavior-Specific Praise in Pre-K–12 Settings: Mapping the 50-Year Knowledge Base. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), s. 131–147.
Ennis, R. P., Royer, D. J., Lane, K. L., & Dunlap, K. D. (2020b). The Impact of Coaching on Teacher-Delivered Behavior-Specific Praise in Pre-K–12 Settings: A Systematic Review. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), s. 148–166.
Ertesvåg, S. K. (2019). Leiarskap i klasseromet ein nøkkel til likeverdig opplæring. I Erikson, R. & Unemo, L. (red.), Lika för alla? En ESO-antologi om skolans likvärdighet (Vol. 2019:1, s. 127–150). Stockholm: ESO
Evans, J., Harden, A., & Thomas, J. (2004). What are effective strategies to support pupils with emotional and behavioural difficulties (EBD) in mainstream primary schools? Findings from a systematic review of research. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 4(1), s. 2–16.
Evans, J., Harden, A., Thomas, J., & Benefield, P. (2003). Support for pupils with emotional and behavioural difficulties (EBD) in mainstream primary classrooms: a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006a). Classroom Management as a Field of Inquiry. I Evertson, C. M. & Weinstein, C. S. (red.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (s. 3–15). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006b). Handbook of classroom management : research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Flower, A., McKenna, J. W., Bunuan, R. L., Muething, C. S., & Vega, R. (2014). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on Challenging Behaviors in School Settings. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), s. 546–571.
Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-report Instruments. I Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (red.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (s. 763–782). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Ghaderi, A., Johansson, M., & Enebrink, P. (2017). Pilotstudie av PAX i skolan. En kulturanpassad version av PAX Good Behavior Game. Solna: Karolinska Institutet.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Gough, D., & Thomas, J. (2016). Systematic reviews of research in education: aims, myths and multiple methods. Review of Education, 4(1), s. 84–102.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), s. 91–108.
Harden, A., Thomas, J., Evans, J., Scanlon, M., & Sinclair, J. (2003). Supporting pupils with emotional and behavioural difficulties (EBD) in mainstream primary schools: a systematic review of recent research on strategy effectiveness (1999 to 2002). London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Hirsh, Å., Nilholm, C., Roman, H., Forsberg, E., & Sundberg, D. (2020). Reviews of teaching methods – which fundamental issues are identified? Education Inquiry, s. 1–20.
Karlsson, P. (2020). Tydlighet, ledarskap & uppmuntran : positivt beteendestöd i klassrummet : en arbetsbok för lärare och andra vuxna i skolan. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Classroom Management Strategies and Classroom Management Programs on Students’ Academic, Behavioral, Emotional, and Motivational Outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), s. 643–680.
Leahy, L., Miller, F., & Schardt, A. (2019). Effects of Teacher-Directed Opportunities to Respond on Student Behavioral Outcomes: A Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Case Design Research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(1), s. 78–106.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), s. e1–e34.
Long, A., Miller, F., & Upright, J. (2019). Classroom Management for Ethnic-Racial Minority Students: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Design Studies. School Psychology Quarterly, 34(1), s. 1–13.
MacSuga-Gage, A., & Simonsen, B. (2015). Examining the Effects of Teacher-Directed Opportunities to Respond on Student Outcomes: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(2), s. 211–239.
Maggin, D. M., Johnson, A. H., Chafouleas, S. M., Ruberto, L. M., & Berggren, M. (2012). A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 50(5), s. 625–654.
Maggin, D. M., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Johnson, A. H. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Group Contingency Interventions for Students With Challenging Behavior: An Update. Remedial and Special Education, 38(6), s. 353–370.
Markelz, A., & Taylor, J. (2016). Effects of teacher praise on attending behaviors and academic achievement of students with emotional and behavioral disabilities. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 5(1), s. 1–16.
Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom management that works – research-based strategies for every teacher. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Moore, D., Benham-Clarke, S., Kenchington, R., Boyle, C., Ford, T., Hayes, R., & Rogers, M. (2019a). Improving Behaviour in Schools: Evidence Review. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
Moore, T., Maggin, D., Thompson, K., Gordon, J., Daniels, S., & Lang, L. (2019b). Evidence Review for Teacher Praise to Improve Students’ Classroom Behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(1), s. 3–18.
Nilholm, C. (2012). Barn och elever i svårigheter: en pedagogisk utmaning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Nilsson, J., & Karlberg, M. (2020). Handbok i klassrumsledarskap. Stockholm: Liber.
Nordenbo, S. E., Søgaard Larsen, M., Tiftikci, N., Wendt, R. E., & Østergaard, S. (2008). Lærerkompetanser og elevers læring i førskole og skole – Et systematisk review utført for Kunnskapsdepartementet. Köpenhamn: Dansk Clearinghouse for Uddannelsesforskning
Ogden, T., & Trägårdh, E. (2017). Ledarskap i klassen : praktik, teori och forskning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Oliver, R. M., Wehby, J. H., & Reschly, D. J. (2011). Teacher classroom management practices: effects on disruptive or aggressive student behavior. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 7(1), s. 1–55.
Owiny, R. L., Spriggs, A. D., Sartini, E. C., & Mills, J. R. (2018). Evaluating response cards as evidence based. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(2), s. 59–72.
Pihlgren, A. S. (2019). Skolans konflikter : vad varje lärare bör veta. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Postholm, M. B. (2013). Classroom Management: What Does Research Tell Us? European Educational Research Journal, 12(3), s. 389–402.
Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and Contextual Associations Between Teacher–Student Relationships and Student Engagement: A Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), s. 345–387.
Riley-Tillman, T. C., Chafouleas, S. M., Sassu, K. A., Chanese, J. A. M., & Glazer, A. D. (2008). Examining the Agreement of Direct Behavior Ratings and Systematic Direct Observation Data for On-Task and Disruptive Behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10(2), s. 136–143.
Rispoli, M., Zaini, S., Mason, R., Brodhead, M., Burke, M., & Gregori, E. (2017). A systematic review of teacher self-monitoring on implementation of behavioral practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63(4), s. 58–72.
Roorda, D., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F., & Koomen, H. (2017). Affective Teacher–Student Relationships and Students’ Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Update and Test of the Mediating Role of Engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3), s. 1–23.
Roorda, D., Zee, M., & Koomen, H. (2020). Don’t forget student-teacher dependency! A Meta-analysis on associations with students’ school adjustment and the moderating role of student and teacher characteristics. Attachment & Human Development, s. 1–14.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The Influence of Affective Teacher–Student Relationships on Students’ School Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), s. 493–529.
Royer, D. J., Lane, K. L., Cantwell, E. D., & Messenger, M. L. (2017). A Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Instructional Choice in K–12 Settings. Behavioral Disorders, 42(3), s. 89–107.
Royer, D. J., Lane, K. L., Dunlap, K. D., & Ennis, R. P. (2019). A Systematic Review of Teacher-Delivered Behavior-Specific Praise on K–12 Student Performance. Remedial and Special Education, 40(2), s. 112–128.
Samuelsson, M. (2008). Störande elever korrigerande lärare : om regler, förväntningar och lärares åtgärder mot störande flickor och pojkar i klassrummet. Diss. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.
Samuelsson, M. (2017). Lärandets ordning och reda : ledarskap i klassrummet. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer.
SBU. (2015). Skolbaserade program för att förebygga självskadebeteende inklusive suicidförsök. En systematisk litteraturöversikt. Stockholm: Statens beredning för medicinsk och social utvärdering (SBU).
Schlesier, J., Roden, I., & Moschner, B. (2019). Emotion regulation in primary school children: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 100(5), s. 239–257.
Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based Practices in Classroom Management: Considerations for Research to Practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(3), s. 351–380.
Sjöberg, G. (2006). Om det inte är dyskalkyli – vad är det då? : en multimetodstudie av eleven i matematikproblem ur ett longitudinellt perspektiv. Diss. Umeå: Umeå universitet.
Skolinspektionen. (2015). Kunskapsöversikt för skolans arbete för att säkerställa studiero. Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
Skolinspektionen. (2016). Skolans arbete för att säkerställa studiero – det räcker inte att det är lugnt, eleverna måste lära sig något också. Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
Skolinspektionen. (2019a). Beslut 2019-02-27. Dnr 43-2018:6434.
Skolinspektionen. (2019b). Beslut 2019-02-28. Dnr 43-2018:6512.
Skolinspektionen. (2020a). Grundskolors arbete med jämställdhet – med särskilt fokus på en trygg skolmiljö för alla elever Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
Skolinspektionen. (2020b). Skolors arbete med trygghet och studiero. En tematisk analys utifrån beslut fattade inom regelbunden kvalitetsgranskning 2018–2019 Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
Skolverket (2019). TALIS 2018. En studie om lärares och rektorers arbete i grund- och gymnasieskolan. Stockholm: Skolverket
Smith, S., Barajas, K., Ellis, B., Moore, C., McCauley, S., & Reichow, B. (2021). A Meta-Analytic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of the Good Behavior Game. Behavior Modification, 45(4), s. 641–666.
SOU 2017:35. Samling för skolan – Nationell strategi för kunskap och likvärdighet. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet
Spanjers, D., Burns, M., & Wagner, A. (2008). Systematic Direct Observation of Time on Task as a Measure of Student Engagement (Vol. 33). London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Søndergaard, D. M., Plauborg, H., Szulevicz, T., Fisker, T. B., Mørup, T., Tetzlaff-Petersen, L., Hagensen, M. W., Hansen, A. V., Øgendal, G., Pedersen, H. S., & Werborg, P. (2014). Ro og klasseledelse i folkeskolen. Rapport fra ekspertgruppen om ro og klasseledelse. Danmark: Undervisningsministeriet.
Veenman, B., Luman, M., & Oosterlaan, J. (2018). Efficacy of behavioral classroom programs in primary school. A meta-analysis focusing on randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE, 13(10), s. 1–23.
Wannarka, R., & Ruhl, K. (2008). Seating arrangements that promote positive academic and behavioural outcomes: a review of empirical research. Support for Learning, 23(2), s. 89–93.
Wester, M. (2008). ”Hålla ordning, men inte överordning”. Köns- och maktperspektiv på uppförandenormer i svenska klassrumskulturer. Diss. Umeå: Umeå universitet.