Referenser
[1] C. Ottander & K. Ottander. (2016). Undervisning utifrån samhällsfrågor med naturvetenskapligt innehåll. Naturvetenskap – Gymnasieskola. Modul: Samhällsfrågor med naturvetenskapligt innehåll. Del 1: Undervisning utifrån SNI. Skolverket. Lärportalen.
[2] D. L. Zeidler, B. C. Herman, & T. D. Sadler, ”New directions in socioscientific issues research”, Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, vol. 1, nr 1, s. 11, 2019.
[3] L. Bencze, C. Pouliot, E. Pedretti, L. Simonneaux, J. Simonneaux, & D. Zeidler, ”SAQ, SSI and STSE education: defending and extending “science-in-context””, Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol. 15, nr 3, s. 825–851, 2020.
[4] U. Bossér, ”Exploring the complexities of integrating socioscientific issues in science teaching,” [Doktorsavhandling] Växjö: Linnaeus University Press, 2018.
[5] M. Ratcliffe & M. Grace, Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. McGraw-Hill Education (UK), 2003.
[6] R. Levinson, ”Towards a Theoretical Framework for Teaching Controversial Socio‐scientific Issues”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 28, nr 10, s. 1201–1224, 2006.
[7] Förenta nationerna, ”Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development,” 2016.
[8] H. Gresch, M. Hasselhorn, & S. Bögeholz, ”Training in Decision-Making Strategies: An Approach to Enhance Students’ Competence to Deal with Socio-Scientific Issues”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 35, nr 15, s. 2587–2607, 2013.
[9] H. Carlsen & N. Weitz, ”Analys av synergier och målkonflikter i Sveriges frivilliga granskning av arbetet med Agenda 2030,” Stockholm Environment Institute, 2021.
[10] J. Rottman, ”Breaking down biocentrism: two distinct forms of moral concern for nature”, Frontiers in psychology, vol. 5, s. 905–905, 2014.
[11] C. Bernes, En varmare värld: Växthuseffekten och klimatets förändringar. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket, 2017.
[12] C. Folke, S. Polasky, J. Rockström, V. Galaz, F. Westley, M. Lamont, M. Scheffer, H. Österblom, S. R. Carpenter, F. S. Chapin, K. C. Seto, E. U. Weber, B. I. Crona, G. C. Daily, P. Dasgupta, O. Gaffney, L. J. Gordon, H. Hoff, S. A. Levin, J. Lubchenco, W. Steffen, & B. H. Walker, ”Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere”, Ambio, vol. 50, nr 4, s. 834–869, 2021.
[13] N. Atabey & M. S. Topcu, ”Middle School Students’ Environmental Attitudes and Informal Reasoning Regarding an Environmental Socioscientific Issue”, International Journal of Progressive Education, vol. 16, nr 5, s. 90–105, 2020.
[14] G. Kim, Y. Ko, & H. Lee, ”The Effects of Community-Based Socioscientific Issues Program (SSI-COMM) on Promoting Students’ Sense of Place and Character as Citizens”, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 18, nr 3, s. 399–418, 2020.
[15] M. Jafari & A. Meisert, ”Activating Students’ Argumentative Resources on Socioscientific Issues by Indirectly Instructed Reasoning and Negotiation Processes”, Research in Science Education, vol. 15, nr.2, s. 913–934, 2021.
[16] K. J. Sagmeister, C. W. Schinagl, S. Kapelari, & P. Vrabl, ”Students’ Experiences of Working With a Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Curriculum Unit Using Role-Playing to Negotiate Antibiotic Resistance”, Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 11, 2021.
[17] M. Fairbrother, G. Arrhenius, K. Bykvist, & T. Campbell, ”How Much Do We Value Future Generations? Climate Change, Debt, and Attitudes towards Policies for Improving Future Lives,” i Studies on Climate Ethics and Future Generations. P. Bowman & K. B. Rasmussen, red. Stockholm: Institute for Futures Studies, 2020, vol. 2, s. 237–262.
[18] M. Angelin, J. Gyllenpalm, & P.-O. Wickman. (2017). Kriterier för källkritik. Naturvetenskap – Gymnasieskola. Modul: Naturvetenskapens karaktär och arbetssätt. Del 7: Naturvetenskap och källkritik. Skolverket. Lärportalen.
[19] Skolforskningsinstitutet, Kritiskt tänkande och källkritik – undervisning i samhällskunskap. Systematisk översikt 2020:03. Solna, 2020.
[20] S. O. Hansson, Konsten att vara vetenskaplig. Stockholm: Institutionen för filosofi och teknikhistoria, KTH, 2007.
[21] J. Wiblom, C.-J. Rundgren, & M. Andrée, ”Developing Students’ Critical Reasoning About Online Health Information: a Capabilities Approach”, Research in Science Education, vol. 49, nr 6, s. 1759–1782, 2019.
[22] OECD, Trends Shaping Education 2022, 2022.
[23] U. Bossér & J. Sjöström, ”Samhällsfrågor i nv-klassrummen–från enkel kontextualisering till fokus på handlingskompetens för global miljörättvisa”, Atena Didaktik, vol. 2, nr 1, s. 1–7, 2020.
[24] S. Seethaler & M. Linn, ”Genetically modified food in perspective: an inquiry-based curriculum to help middle school students make sense of tradeoffs”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 26, nr 14, s. 1765–1785, 2004.
[25] L. Agell, V. Soria, & M. Carrió, ”Using Role Play to Debate Animal Testing”, Journal of Biological Education, vol. 49, nr 3, s. 309–321, 2015.
[26] Skolverket, Läroplan för grundskolan samt för förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet. Stockholm: Skolverket, 2022.
[27] Skolverket, Läroplan för gymnasieskolan. Stockholm: Skolverket, 2022.
[28] D. King, ”New perspectives on context-based chemistry education: using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning”, Studies in Science Education, vol. 48, nr 1, s. 51–87, 2012.
[29] J. K. Gilbert, ”On the Nature of “Context” in Chemical Education”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 28, nr 9, s. 957–976, 2006.
[30] T. Chowdhury, J. Holbrook, & M. Rannikmäe, ”Socioscientific issues within science education and their role in promoting the desired citizenry”, Science Education International, vol. 31, nr 2, s. 203–208, 2020.
[31] E. Pedretti & J. Nazir, ”Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on”, Science education, vol. 95, nr 4, s. 601–626, 2011.
[32] M. Eriksson, ”Att ta ställning: gymnasieelevers argumentation och beslutsfattande om sociovetenskapliga dilemman,” [Licentiatavhandling] Karlstad: Karlstads universitet, 2014.
[33] L. Simonneaux, N. Panissal, & E. Brossais, ”Students’ Perception of Risk about Nanotechnology after an SAQ Teaching Strategy”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 35, nr 14, s. 2376–2406, 2013.
[34] T. D. Sadler, S. A. Barab, & B. Scott, ”What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?”, Research in science education, vol. 37, nr 4, s. 371–391, 2007.
[35] L. Simonneaux, ”Argumentation in science education: An overview”, Argumentation in science education, s. 179–199, 2007.
[36] L. Bencze & L. Carter, ”Globalizing students acting for the common good”, Journal of Research in Science teaching, vol. 48, nr 6, s. 648–669, 2011.
[37] L. Schenk, K. M. Hamza, M. Enghag, I. Lundegård, L. Arvanitis, K. Haglund, & A. Wojcik, ”Teaching and discussing about risk: seven elements of potential significance for science education”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 41, nr 9, s. 1271–1286, 2019.
[38] D. Aguilera & J. Ortiz-Revilla, ”STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review”, Education Sciences, vol. 11, nr 7, s. 331, 2021.
[39] L. Chen & S. Xiao, ”Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review”, Educational Research Review, vol. 32, 2021.
[40] S. Tidemand & J. A. Nielsen, ”The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: from the perspective of teachers”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 39, nr 1, s. 44–61, 2017.
[41] D. L. Zeidler, T. D. Sadler, S. Applebaum, & B. E. Callahan, ”Advancing Reflective Judgment through Socioscientific Issues”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 46, nr 1, s. 74–101, 2009.
[42] T. S. Hancock, P. J. Friedrichsen, A. T. Kinslow, & T. D. Sadler, ”Selecting socio-scientific issues for teaching”, Science & Education, vol. 28, nr 6, s. 639–667, 2019.
[43] H.-Y. Chang, J.-C. Liang, & C.-C. Tsai, ”Students’ Context-Specific Epistemic Justifications, Prior Knowledge, Engagement, and Socioscientific Reasoning in a Mobile Augmented Reality Learning Environment”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 29, nr 3, s. 399–408, 2020.
[44] Sveriges meteorologiska och hydrologiska institut (SMHI). Växthuseffekten. www.smhi.se. (2022-02-23).
[45] U. Bossér & M. Lindahl, ”Students’ Positioning in the Classroom: A Study of Teacher-Student Interactions in a Socioscientific Issue Context”, Research in Science Education, vol. 49, nr 2, s. 371–390, 2019.
[46] P. M. Kurup, R. Levinson, & X. Li, ”Informed-Decision Regarding Global Warming and Climate Change Among High School Students in the United Kingdom”, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 21, nr. 1, s. 166–185, 2021.
[47] A. M. Sutter, J. M. Dauer, T. Kreuziger, J. Schubert, & C. T. Forbes, ”Sixth Grade Students’ Problematization of and Decision-Making about a Wind Energy Socio-Scientific Issue”, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, vol. 28, nr 3, s. 242–256, 2019.
[48] A. Solli, T. Hillman, & Å. Mäkitalo, ”Navigating the Complexity of Socio-scientific Controversies—How Students Make Multiple Voices Present in Discourse”, Research in Science Education, vol. 49, nr 6, s. 1595–1623, 2019.
[49] Naturvårdsverket. Arter och artskydd. www.naturvardsverket.se. (2022-02-23).
[50] Y. C. Lee, M. Grace, W. Rietdijk, & Y. C. Lui, ”A Cross-Cultural, Cross-Age, and Cross-Gender Study of Hong Kong and UK Secondary Students’ Decision Making about a Biological Conservation Issue”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 41, nr 18, s. 2696–2715, 2019.
[51] M. Eriksson & C.-J. Rundgren, ”Vargfrågan – Gymnasieelevers argumentation kring ett sociovetenskapligt dilemma”, NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education, vol. 8, nr. 1, s. 43–58, 2012.
[52] Naturvårdsverket. Miljöföroreningar. www.naturvardsverket.se. (2022-02-28).
[53] J. Anker-Hansen & M. Andrée, ”Affordances and Constraints of Using the Socio-Political Debate for Authentic Summative Assessment”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 37, nr 15, s. 2577–2596, 2015.
[54] E. Karahan & G. Roehrig, ”Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Science and Their Socioscientific Reasoning”, Research in Science Education, vol. 47, nr 4,
s. 755–782, 2017.
[55] Boverket. Kommunalt planmonopol. www.boverket.se. (2022-03-01).
[56] E. Iversen & G. Jónsdóttir, ”’We Did See the Lapwing’ – Practising Environmental Citizenship in Upper-Secondary Science Education”, Environmental Education Research, vol. 25, nr 3, s. 411–421, 2019.
[57] N. Lynöe & N. Juth, Medicinska etikens ABZ. Stockholm: Liber, 2009.
[58] Gentekniknämnden. Människa och medicin. www.genteknik.se. (2022-03-07).
[59] B. Berne, ”Progression in Ethical Reasoning When Addressing Socio-Scientific Issues in Biotechnology”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 36, nr 17, s. 2958–2977, 2014.
[60] J. T. Chowning, J. C. Griswold, D. N. Kovarik, & L. J. Collins, ”Fostering critical thinking, reasoning, and argumentation skills through bioethics education”, PLoS ONE, vol. 7, nr 5, 2012.
[61] Livsmedelsverket. Genmodifierad mat, GMO. www.livsmedelsverket.se. (2022-03-07).
[62] C. Ottander & M. Ekborg, ”Students’ Experience of Working with Socioscientific Issues – a Quantitative Study in Secondary School”, Research in Science Education, vol. 42, nr 6, s. 1147–1163, 2012.
[63] Kemikalieinspektionen. Kemiska ämnen och material. www.kemi.se. (2022-03-07).
[64] Naturvårdsverket. Luft. www.naturvardsverket.se. (2022-03-07).
[65] C. Dudas, C.-J. Rundgren, & I. Lundegård, ”Didactic modelling of complex sustainability issues in chemistry education”, NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education, vol. 14, nr 3, s. 267–284, 2018.
[66] Sveriges miljömål. Säker strålmiljö. /www.sverigesmiljomal.se. (2022-03-07).
[67] Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten. Områden. www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se. (2022-03-07).
[68] Folkhälsomyndigheten. Elektromagnetiska fält. www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se. (2022-03-07).
[69] Y.-T. Wu & C.-C. Tsai, ”The Effects of Different On-Line Searching Activities on High School Students’ Cognitive Structures and Informal Reasoning regarding a Socio-Scientific Issue”, Research in Science Education, vol. 41, nr 5, s. 771–785, 2011.
[70] J.-W. Lin, T.-S. Cheng, S.-J. Wang, & C.-T. Chung, ”The effects of socioscientific issues web searches on grade 6 students’ scientific epistemological beliefs: the role of information positions”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 42, nr 15, s. 2534–2553, 2020.
[71] K. Rudsberg, J. Öhman, & L. Östman, ”Analyzing Students’ Learning in Classroom Discussions about Socioscientific Issues”, Science Education, vol. 97, nr 4, s. 594–620, 2013.
[72] Y.-R. Lin & J.-F. Hung, ”The Analysis and Reconciliation of Students’ Rebuttals in Argumentation Activities”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 38, nr 1, s. 130–155, 2016.
[73] A. K. Byhring & E. Knain, ”Intertextuality for Handling Complex Environmental Issues”, Research in Science Education, vol. 46, nr 1, s. 1–19, 2016.
[74] J. A. Rudd, R. Horry, & R. L. Skains, ”You and CO2: a Public Engagement Study to Engage Secondary School Students with the Issue of Climate Change”, Journal of Science Education & Technology, vol. 29, nr 2, s. 230–241, 2020.
[75] V. Dawson & K. Carson, ”Using Climate Change Scenarios to Assess High School Students’ Argumentation Skills”, Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 35, nr 1, s. 1–16, 2017.
[76] C. von Aufschnaiter, S. Erduran, J. Osborne, & S. Simon, ”Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Case Studies of How Students’ Argumentation Relates to Their Scientific Knowledge”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 45, nr 1, s. 101–131, 2008.
[77] Y. Chung, J. Yoo, S.-W. Kim, H. Lee, & D. L. Zeidler, ”Enhancing Students’ Communication Skills in the Science Classroom through Socioscientific Issues”, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 14, nr 1, s. 1–27, 2016.
[78] P.-O. Wickman & H. Persson, Naturvetenskap och naturorienterande ämnen i grundskolan – en ämnesdidaktisk vägledning. Stockholm: Liber, 2015.
[79] S. Okasha, Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[80] Skolforskningsinstitutet, Laborationer i naturvetenskapsundervisningen. Systematisk översikt 2020:01. Solna, 2020.
[81] S. R. Fowler, D. L. Zeidler, & T. D. Sadler, ”Moral Sensitivity in the Context of Socioscientific Issues in High School Science Students”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, nr 2, s. 279–296, 2009.
[82] V. Albe, ”When Scientific Knowledge, Daily Life Experience, Epistemological and Social Considerations Intersect: Students’ Argumentation in Group Discussions on a Socio-Scientific Issue”, Research in Science Education, vol. 38, nr 1, s. 67–90, 2008.
[83] V. Albe & M.-J. Gombert, ”Students’ Communication, Argumentation and Knowledge in a Citizens’ Conference on Global Warming”, Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol. 7, nr 3, s. 659–681, 2012.
[84] S. A. Barab, T. D. Sadler, C. Heiselt, D. Hickey, & S. Zuiker, ”Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 16, nr 1, s. 59–82, 2007.
[85] D. Bayram-Jacobs, G. Wieske, & I. Henze, ”A Chemistry Lesson for Citizenship: Students’ Use of Different Perspectives in Decision-Making about the Use and Sale of Laughing Gas”, Education Sciences, vol. 9, 2019.
[86] D. J. Boerwinkel, M.-C. Knippels, & A. J. Waarlo, ”Raising Awareness of Pre-Symptomatic Genetic Testing”, Journal of Biological Education, vol. 45, nr 4, s. 213–221, 2011.
[87] U. Bossér & M. G., Lindahl, ”Students’ Use of Open-Minded Attitude and Elaborate Talk in Group Discussion and Role-Playing Debate on Socioscientific Issues”, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, nr 12, 2020.
[88] F. Bottcher & A. Meisert, ”Effects of Direct and Indirect Instruction on Fostering Decision-Making Competence in Socioscientific Issues”, Research in Science Education, vol. 43, nr 2, s. 479–506, 2013.
[89] L. M. Bouillion & L. M. Gomez, ”Connecting school and community with science learning: real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 38, nr 8, s. 878–898, 2001.
[90] J. Byrne, M. Ideland, C. Malmberg, & M. Grace, ”Climate Change and Everyday Life: Repertoires Children Use to Negotiate a Socio-Scientific Issue”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 36, nr 9, s. 1491–1509, 2014.
[91] E. Capkinoglu, S. Yilmaz, & G. Leblebicioglu, ”Quality of argumentation by seventh‐graders in local socioscientific issues”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 57, nr 6, s. 827–855, 2020.
[92] C. Castano, ”Socio-Scientific Discussions as a Way to Improve the Comprehension of Science and the Understanding of the Interrelation between Species and the Environment”, Research in Science Education, vol. 38, nr 5, s. 565–587, 2008.
[93] S. Y. Chen & S. Y. Liu, ”Reinforcement of scientific literacy through effective argumentation on an energy-related environmental issue”, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, nr 12, 2018.
[94] N. Christenson, S.-N. Chang Rundgren, & H.-O. Hoglund, ”Using the SEE-SEP Model to Analyze Upper Secondary Students’ Use of Supporting Reasons in Arguing Socioscientific Issues”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 21, nr 3, s. 342–352, 2012.
[95] N. Christenson, S.-N. C. Rundgren, & D. L. Zeidler, ”The Relationship of Discipline Background to Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation on Socioscientific Issues”, Research in Science Education, vol. 44, nr 4, s. 581–601, 2014.
[96] H. Cian, ”The Influence of Context: Comparing High School Students’ Socioscientific Reasoning by Socioscientific Topic”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 42, nr 9, s. 1503–1521, 2020.
[97] F. Cornali, G. Pomatto, & S. Agnella, ”Deliberating science in Italian high school. The case of the acienza attiva project”, Journal of Science Communication, vol. 16, nr 1, 2017.
[98] V. Dawson & G. Venville, ”Introducing High School Biology Students to Argumentation about Socioscientific Issues”, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 13, nr 4, s. 356–372, 2013.
[99] V. Dawson & G. Venville, ”Testing a methodology for the development of socioscientific issues to enhance middle school students’ argumentation and reasoning”, Research in Science and Technological Education, s. 1–16, 2020.
[100] V. Dawson & G. J. Venville, ”High-school Students’ Informal Reasoning and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy?”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, nr 11, s. 1421–1445, 2009.
[101] S. Eggert, F. Ostermeyer, M. Hasselhorn, & S. Bögeholz, ”Socioscientific Decision Making in the Science Classroom: The Effect of Embedded Metacognitive Instructions on Students’ Learning Outcomes”, Education Research International, s. 1–12, 2013.
[102] M. Ekborg, ”Opinion Building on a Socio-Scientific Issue: The Case of Genetically Modified Plants”, Journal of Biological Education, vol. 42, nr 2, s. 60–65, 2008.
[103] M. Evagorou, M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre, & J. Osborne, ”’Should We Kill the Grey Squirrels?’ A Study Exploring Students’ Justifications and Decision-Making”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 34, nr 3, s. 401–428, 2012.
[104] M. Evagorou & J. Osborne, ”Exploring Young Students’ Collaborative Argumentation within a Socioscientific Issue”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 50, nr 2, 2013.
[105] T. Feierabend, M. Stuckey, S. Nienaber, & I. Eilks, ”Two approaches for analyzing students’ competence of ’evaluation’ in group discussions about climate change”, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 7, nr 4, s. 581–598, 2012.
[106] A. Furberg & S. Ludvigsen, ”Students’ Meaning‐making of Socio‐scientific Issues in Computer Mediated Settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 30, nr 13, s. 1775–1799, 2008.
[107] L. Gao, K. Mun, & S. W. Kim, ”Using Socioscientific Issues to Enhance Students’ Emotional Competence”, Research in Science Education, vol. 51, nr 2, s. 935–956. 2021.
[108] M. Grace, ”Developing High Quality Decision-Making Discussions about Biological Conservation in a Normal Classroom Setting”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, nr 4, s. 551–570, 2009.
[109] M. Grace, Y. C. Lee, R. Asshoff, & A. Wallin, ”Student Decision-Making about a Globally Familiar Socioscientific Issue: The Value of Sharing and Comparing Views with International Counterparts”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 37, nr 11, s. 1855–1874, 2015.
[110] H. Gresch & S. Bögeholz, ”Identifying Non-Sustainable Courses of Action: A Prerequisite for Decision-Making in Education for Sustainable Development”, Research in Science Education, vol. 43, nr 2, s. 733–754, 2013.
[111] H. Gresch, M. Hasselhorn, & S. Bögeholz, ”Enhancing Decision-Making in STSE Education by Inducing Reflection and Self-Regulated Learning”, Research in Science Education, vol. 47, nr 1, s. 95–118, 2017.
[112] L. Hansson, A. Redfors, & M. Rosberg, ”Students’ Socio-Scientific Reasoning in an Astrobiological Context during Work with a Digital Learning Environment”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 20, nr 4, s. 388–402, 2011.
[113] R. Harris & M. Ratcliffe, ”Socio-Scientific Issues and the Quality of Exploratory Talk – What can be Learned from Schools Involved in a ”Collapsed Day” Project?”, Curriculum Journal, vol. 16, nr 4, s. 439–453, 2005.
[114] B. C. Herman, D. C. Owens, R. T. Oertli, L. A. Zangori, & M. H. Newton, ”Exploring the Complexity of Students’ Scientific Explanations and Associated Nature of Science Views within a Place-Based Socioscientific Issue Context”, Science & Education, vol. 28, nr 3, s. 329–366, 2019.
[115] N. Hermann & S. Menzel, ”Threat Perception and Attitudes of Adolescents towards Re-Introduced Wild Animals: A Qualitative Study of Young Learners from Affected Regions in Germany”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 35, nr 18, s. 3062–3094, 2013.
[116] K. Hogan, ”Small Groups’ Ecological Reasoning While Making an Environmental Management Decision”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 39, nr 4, s. 341–368, 2002.
[117] C. Hsin-Yi, H. Ying-Shao, W. Hsin-Kai, & T. Chin-Chung, ”Students’ development of socio-scientific reasoning in a mobile augmented reality learning environment”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 40, nr 12, s. 1410–1431, 2018.
[118] Y.-S. Hsu & S.-S. Lin, ”Prompting Students to Make Socioscientific Decisions: Embedding Metacognitive Guidance in an E-Learning Environment”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 39, nr 7, s. 964–979, 2017.
[119] M. Ideland & C. Malmberg, ”Body Talk: Students’ Identity Construction while Discussing a Socioscientific Issue”, Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol. 7, nr 2,
s. 279–305, 2012.
[120] M. Ideland, C. Malmberg, & M. Winberg, ”Culturally equipped for socio‐scientific issues? a comparative study on how teachers and students in mono‐ and multiethnic schools handle work with complex issues”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 33, nr 13, s. 1835–1859, 2011.
[121] K. Iordanou & C. P. Constantinou, ”Supporting Use of Evidence in Argumentation Through Practice in Argumentation and Reflection in the Context of SOCRATES Learning Environment”, Science Education, vol. 99, nr 2, s. 282–311, 2015.
[122] H. Jho, H.-G. Yoon, & M. Kim, ”The Relationship of Science Knowledge, Attitude and Decision Making on Socio-Scientific Issues: The Case Study of Students’ Debates on a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea”, Science & Education, vol. 23, nr 5, s. 1131–1151, 2014.
[123] M.-P. Jimenez-Aleixandre & C. Pereiro-Munoz, ”Knowledge Producers or Knowledge Consumers? Argumentation and Decision Making about Environmental Management”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 24, nr 11, s. 1171–1190, 2002.
[124] H. Jung-Lim & C. Nam-Kee, ”Analysis of Korean High School Students’ Decision-Making Processes in Solving a Problem Involving Biological Knowledge”, Research in Science Education, vol. 34, nr 1, s. 97–111, 2004.
[125] M. K. Juntunen & M. K. Aksela, ”Improving Students’ Argumentation Skills through a Product Life-Cycle Analysis Project in Chemistry Education”, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 15, nr 4, s. 639–649, 2014.
[126] M. Karpudewan & W.-M. Roth, ”Changes in Primary Students’ Informal Reasoning during an Environment-Related Curriculum on Socio-Scientific Issues”, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 16, nr 3, s. 401–419, 2018.
[127] L. Ke, T. D. Sadler, L. Zangori, & P. J. Friedrichsen, ”Students’ Perceptions of Socio-Scientific Issue-Based Learning and Their Appropriation of Epistemic Tools for Systems Thinking”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 42, nr 8,
s. 1339–1361, 2020.
[128] R. Khishfe, ”Nature of Science and Decision-Making”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 34, nr 1, s. 67–100, 2012.
[129] R. Khishfe, ”Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An Effect on Student Learning and Transfer”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 36, nr 6, s. 974–1016, 2014.
[130] G. Kim & H. Lee, ”A case study of community-based socioscientific issue program: focusing on the abandoned animal issue”, Journal of biological education, vol. 55, nr 4, s. 1–15, 2019.
[131] M. Kim & W.-M. Roth, ”Rethinking the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge: A Case Study of Teaching the Environment in Science Classrooms”, Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 9, nr 4, s. 516–528, 2008.
[132] A. T. Kinslow, T. D. Sadler, & H. T. Nguyen, ”Socio-Scientific Reasoning and Environmental Literacy in a Field-Based Ecology Class”, Environmental Education Research, vol. 25, nr 3, s. 388–410, 2019.
[133] L. T. Klaver & J. H. Walma van der Molen, ”Measuring Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire”, Science & Education, vol. 30, nr 2, s. 317–344, 2021.
[134] M. L. Klosterman & T. D. Sadler, ”Multi-Level Assessment of Scientific Content Knowledge Gains Associated with Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 32, nr 8, s. 1017–1043, 2010.
[135] T. Kolarova, I. Hadjiali, & I. Denev, ”High school students’ reasoning in making decisions about socio-ethical issues of genetic engineering: Case of gene therapy”, Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, vol. 27, nr 2, s. 3737–3747, 2013.
[136] S. D. Kolstø, ”’To trust or not to trust,…’ – pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 23, nr 9, s. 877–901, 2001.
[137] S. D. Kolstø, ”Patterns in Students’ Argumentation Confronted with a Risk-Focused Socio-Scientific Issue”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 28, nr 14, s. 1689–1716, 2006.
[138] H. Lee, H. Lee, & D. L. Zeidler, ”Examining Tensions in the Socioscientific Issues Classroom: Students’ Border Crossings into a New Culture of Science”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 57, nr 5, s. 672–694, 2020.
[139] H. Lee, J. Yoo, K. Choi, S.-W. Kim, J. Krajcik, B. C. Herman, & D. L. Zeidler, ”Socioscientific Issues as a Vehicle for Promoting Character and Values for Global Citizens”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 35, nr 12, s. 2079–2113, 2013.
[140] Y. C. Lee & M. Grace, ”Students’ Reasoning Processes in Making Decisions about an Authentic, Local Socio-Scientific Issue: Bat Conservation”, Journal of Biological Education, vol. 44, nr 4, s. 156–165, 2010.
[141] Y. C. Lee & M. Grace, ”Students’ Reasoning and Decision Making about a Socioscientific Issue: A Cross-Context Comparison”, Science Education, vol. 96, nr 5, s. 787–807, 2012.
[142] R. Levinson, ”Teaching Bioethics in Science: Crossing a Bridge Too Far?”, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, vol. 4, nr 3, s. 353–369, 2004.
[143] T. Levy Nahum, D. Ben-Chaim, I. Azaiza, O. Herskovitz, & U. Zoller, ”Does STES-Oriented Science Education Promote 10th-Grade Students’ Decision-Making Capability?”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 32, nr 10, s. 1315–1336, 2010.
[144] J. Lewis & J. Leach, ”Discussion of Socio-scientific Issues: The role of science knowledge”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 28, nr 11, s. 1267–1287, 2006.
[145] S.-S. Lin & J. J. Mintzes, ”Learning Argumentation Skills through Instruction in Socioscientific Issues: The Effect of Ability Level”, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 8, nr 6, s. 993–1017, 2010.
[146] Y.-R. Lin, ”Student positions and web-based argumentation with the support of the six thinking hats”, Computers & Education, vol. 139, s. 191–206, 2019.
[147] Y.-R. Lin, B. Fan, & K. Xie, ”The influence of a web-based learning environment on low achievers’ science argumentation”, Computers & Education, vol. 151, 2020.
[148] M. G. Lindahl & A.-M. Folkesson, ”Attitudes and Language Use in Group Discussions on Socio-Scientific Issues”, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, nr 2, 283–301, 2016.
[149] M. G. Lindahl, A.-M. Folkesson, & D. L. Zeidler, ”Students’ Recognition of Educational Demands in the Context of a Socioscientific Issues Curriculum”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 56, nr 9, s. 1155–1182, 2019.
[150] M. G. Lindahl & C. Linder, ”Students’ Ontological Security and Agency in Science Education-An Example from Reasoning about the Use of Gene Technology”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 35, nr 14, s. 2299–2330, 2013.
[151] M. G. Lindahl & M. Lundin, ”How do 15–16 year old students use scientific knowledge to justify their reasoning about human sexuality and relationships?”, Teaching & Teacher Education, vol. 60, s. 121–130, 2016.
[152] D. Lombardi, C. B. Brandt, E. S. Bickel, & C. Burg, ”Students’ Evaluations about Climate Change”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 38, nr 8, s. 1392–1414, 2016.
[153] M. Lundström, M. Ekborg, & M. Ideland, ”To Vaccinate or Not to Vaccinate: How Teenagers Justified Their Decision”, Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol. 7, nr 1, s. 193–221, 2012.
[154] D. Mandler, R. Mamlok-Naaman, R. Blonder, M. Yayon, & A. Hofstein, ”High-School Chemistry Teaching through Environmentally Oriented Curricula”, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 13, nr 2, s. 80–92, 2012.
[155] R. Marks & I. Eilks, ”Research-Based Development of a Lesson Plan on Shower Gels and Musk Fragrances Following a Socio-Critical and Problem-Oriented Approach to Chemistry Teaching”, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 11, nr 2, s. 129–141, 2010.
[156] K. L. McNeill & M. H. Vaughn, ”Urban High School Students’ Critical Science Agency: Conceptual Understandings and Environmental Actions around Climate Change”, Research in Science Education, vol. 42, nr 2, s. 373–399, 2012.
[157] G. Molinatti, Y. Girault, & C. Hammond, ”High School Students Debate the Use of Embryonic Stem Cells: The Influence of Context on Decision-Making”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 32, nr 16, s. 2235–2251, 2010.
[158] C. T. Nicolaou, M. Evagorou, & C. Lymbouridou, ”Elementary School Students’ Emotions When Exploring an Authentic Socio-Scientific Issue through the Use of Models”, Science Education International, vol. 26, nr 2, s. 240–259, 2015.
[159] J. A. Nielsen, ”Arguing from Nature: The Role of ”Nature” in Students’ Argumentations on a Socio-Scientific Issue”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 34, nr 5, s. 723–744, 2012.
[160] J. A. Nielsen, ”Co-Opting Science: A Preliminary Study of How Students Invoke Science in Value-Laden Discussions”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 34, nr 2, s. 275–299, 2012.
[161] J. A. Nielsen, ”Science in Discussions: An Analysis of the Use of Science Content in Socioscientific Discussions”, Science Education, vol. 96, nr 3, s. 428–456, 2012.
[162] A. W. Oliveira, V. L. Akerson, & M. Oldfield, ”Environmental argumentation as sociocultural activity”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 49, nr 7, s. 869–897, 2012.
[163] A. Orlander Arvola & I. Lundegård, ””It’s Her Body”. When Students’ Argumentation Shows Displacement of Content in a Science Classroom”, Research in Science Education, vol. 42, nr 6, s. 1121–1145, 2012.
[164] M. Ozden, ”Elementary School Students’ Informal Reasoning and Its’ Quality Regarding Socio-Scientific Issues”, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, nr 86, s. 61–84, 2020.
[165] N. Papadouris, ”Optimization as a Reasoning Strategy for Dealing with Socioscientific Decision-Making Situations”, Science Education, vol. 96, nr 4, s. 600–630, 2012.
[166] N. Papadouris & C. P. Constantinou, ”Approaches Employed by Sixth-Graders to Compare Rival Solutions in Socio-Scientific Decision-Making Tasks”, Learning and Instruction, vol. 20, nr 3, s. 225–238, 2010.
[167] D. Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, A. C. Hadjichambis, & K. Korfiatis, ”How Students’ Values Are Intertwined with Decisions in a Socio-Scientific Issue”, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 10, nr 3, s. 493–513, 2015.
[168] E. Pedretti, ”Decision making and STS education: exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues-based approach”, School Science & Mathematics, vol. 99, nr 4, s. 174–181, 1999.
[169] C. Persson, ”Hållbar utveckling : en grupp gymnasieelevers resonemang om några livsstilsval”, Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, vol. 1, s. 119-145 2014.
[170] J. Pimvichai, C. Yuenyong, & K. Buaraphan, ”Development of Grade 10 Students’ Scientific Argumentation through the Science-Technology-Society Learning Unit on Work and Energy”, Journal of Technology and Science Education, vol. 9, nr 3, s. 428–441, 2019.
[171] C. Polo, C. Plantin, K. Lund, & G. P. Niccolai, ”Emotional positioning as a cognitive resource for arguing: Lessons from the study of Mexican students debating about drinking water management”, Pragmatics and Society, vol. 8, nr 3, s. 323–354, 2017.
[172] M. Ratcliffe, ”Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 19, s. 167–182, 1997.
[173] A. Raveendran, ”Invoking the Political in Socioscientific Issues: A Study of Indian Students’ Discussions on Commercial Surrogacy”, Science Education, vol. 105, nr 1, s. 62–98, 2021.
[174] S. M. Ritchie, L. Tomas, & M. Tones, ”Writing Stories to Enhance Scientific Literacy”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 33, nr 5, s. 685–707, 2011.
[175] S. L. Rose & A. Calabrese Barton, ”Should Great Lakes City Build a New Power Plant? How Youth Navigate Socioscientific Issues”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 49, nr 5, s. 541–567, 2012.
[176] K. Rudsberg, L. Östman, & E. Aaro Östman, ”Students’ Meaning Making in Classroom Discussions: The Importance of Peer Interaction”, Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol. 12, nr 3, s. 709–738, 2017.
[177] C.-J. Rundgren, M. Eriksson, & S.-N. C. Rundgren, ”Investigating the Intertwinement of Knowledge, Value, and Experience of Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation Concerning Socioscientific Issues”, Science & Education, vol. 25, nr 9, s. 1049–1071, 2016.
[178] T. D. Sadler & L. A. Donnelly, ”Socioscientific Argumentation: The Effects of Content Knowledge and Morality”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 28, nr 12, s. 1463–1488, 2006.
[179] T. D. Sadler, W. L. Romine, & M. S. Topçu, ”Learning Science Content through Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Instruction: A Multi-Level Assessment Study”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 38, nr 10, s. 1622–1635, 2016.
[180] D. M. Schweizer & G. J. Kelly, ”An Investigation of Student Engagement in a Global Warming Debate”, Journal of Geoscience Education, vol. 53, nr 1, s. 75–84, 2005.
[181] C. W. Shoulders & B. E. Myers, ”Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction: An Investigation of Agriscience Students’ Content Knowledge Based on Student Variables”, Journal of Agricultural Education, vol. 54, nr 3, s. 140–156, 2013.
[182] A. Solli, ”Appeals to Science: Recirculation of Online Claims in Socioscientific Reasoning”, Research in Science Education, vol. 51, nr 2, s. 983–1013, 2019.
[183] E. Sperling & J. L. Bencze, ”“More Than Particle Theory”: Citizenship Through School Science”, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, vol. 10, nr 3, s. 255–266, 2010.
[184] T. Stenseth, I. Bråten, & H. I. Strømsø, ”Investigating interest and knowledge as predictors of students’ attitudes towards socio-scientific issues”, Learning & Individual Differences, vol. 47, s. 274–280, 2016.
[185] L. Sternäng & C. Lundholm, ”Climate Change and Morality: Students’ Perspectives on the Individual and Society”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 33, nr 8, s. 1131–1148, 2011.
[186] B. Suephatthima & C. Faikhamta, ”Developing Students’ Argument Skills Using Socioscientific Issues in a Learning Unit on the Fossil Fuel Industry and Its Products”, Science Education International, vol. 29, nr 3, s. 137–148, 2018.
[187] L. Tomas, D. Rigano, & S. M. Ritchie, ”Students’ Regulation of Their Emotions in a Science Classroom”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 53, nr 2, s. 234–260, 2016.
[188] L. Tomas & S. M. Ritchie, ”Positive Emotional Responses to Hybridised Writing about a Socio-Scientific Issue”, Research in Science Education, vol. 42, nr 1, s. 25–49, 2012.
[189] C.-Y. Tsai, ”The effect of online argumentation of socio-scientific issues on students’ scientific competencies and sustainability attitudes”, Computers & Education, vol. 116, s. 14–27, 2018.
[190] G. J. Venville & V. M. Dawson, ”The Impact of a Classroom Intervention on Grade 10 Students’ Argumentation Skills, Informal Reasoning, and Conceptual Understanding of Science”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 47, nr 8, s. 952–977, 2010.
[191] R. Vieira & C. Tenreiro-Vieira, ”Fostering Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking in Elementary Science Education”, International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, vol. 14, nr 4, s. 659–680, 2016.
[192] H.-H. Wang, H.-T. Chen, H.-S. Lin, Y.-N. Huang, & Z.-R. Hong, ”Longitudinal Study of a Cooperation-Driven, Socio-Scientific Issue Intervention on Promoting Students’ Critical Thinking and Self-Regulation in Learning Science”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 39, nr 15, s. 2002–2026, 2017.
[193] R. L. Wiesenmayer & P. A. Rubba, ”The Effects of STS Issue Investigation and Action Instruction versus Traditional Life Science Instruction on Seventh Grade Students’ Citizenship Behaviors”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 8, nr 2, s. 137–144, 1999.
[194] J. Wishart, D. Green, M. Joubert, & P. Triggs, ”Discussing Ethical Issues in School Science: An investigation into the opportunities to practise and develop arguments offered by online and face‐to‐face discussions”, International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, vol. 1, nr 1, s. 47–69, 2011.
[195] Y.-T. Wu & C.-C. Tsai, ”High School Students’ Informal Reasoning on a Socio-Scientific Issue: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 29, nr 9, s. 1163–1187, 2007.
[196] S. Xiao, ”Rhetorical Use of Inscriptions in Students’ Written Arguments about Socioscientific Issues”, Research in Science Education, vol. 50, nr 4, s. 1233–1249, 2020.
[197] S. Xiao & W. A. Sandoval, ”Associations between Attitudes towards Science and Children’s Evaluation of Information about Socioscientific Issues”, Science & Education, vol. 26, nr 3, s. 247–269, 2017.
[198] F.-Y. Yang, ”Exploring High School Students’ Use of Theory and Evidence in an Everyday Context: The Role of Scientific Thinking in Environmental Science Decision-Making”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 26, nr 11, s. 1345–1364, 2004.
[199] F.-Y. Yang, ”Student Views Concerning Evidence and the Expert in Reasoning a Socio-Scientific Issue and Personal Epistemology”, Educational Studies, vol. 31, nr 1, s. 65–84, 2005.
[200] S. A. Yoon, ”Using Social Network Graphs as Visualization Tools to Influence Peer Selection Decision-Making Strategies to Access Information about Complex Socioscientific Issues”, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 20, nr 4, s. 549–588, 2011.
[201] L. Zangori, L. Ke, T. D. Sadler, & A. Peel, ”Exploring Primary Students Causal Reasoning about Ecosystems”, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 42, nr 11, s. 1799–1817, 2020.
[202] L. Zangori, A. Peel, A. Kinslow, P. Friedrichsen, & T. D. Sadler, ”Student development of model‐based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio‐scientific issues unit”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 54, nr 10, s. 1249–1273, 2017.
[203] D. L. Zeidler, B. C. Herman, M. Ruzek, A. Linder, & S. S. Lin, ”Cross‐cultural epistemological orientations to socioscientific issues”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 50, nr 3, s. 251–283, 2013.
[204] D. Åkerblom & M. Lindahl, ”Authenticity and the relevance of discourse and figured worlds in secondary students’ discussions of socioscientific issues”, Teaching & Teacher Education, vol. 65, s. 205–214, 2017.
[205] Direktoratet for høgare utdanning og kompetanse. (2022). Register over vitenskapelige publiseringskanaler. www.kanalregister.hkdir.no.
[206] Vetenskapsrådet. Bibliometri – ett mått på forskningens kvalitet. www.vr.se. (2022-03-23).